Review the Latest Research in Critical Care
We know how busy you are caring for critically ill patients. That’s why, as a Select or Professional member, you receive Critical Pulse—a concise, curated update with the latest information and insights to help you stay current and deliver the highest-quality care.
Remote Monitoring Does Not Appear to Reduce Hospital Readmissions in Older Adults With Sepsis or Lower Respiratory Infection
An RCT published in JAMA Network evaluated the effectiveness of remote monitoring in reducing readmissions following hospitalizations for serious infections overall and across prespecified subgroups. The study included 1286 patients who were randomized to usual care or remote patient monitoring (RPM) with low- or high-intensity questionnaires and standard or enhanced clinical response team combinations: RPM-low standard response, RPM-high standard response, RPM-low enhanced response, and RPM-high enhanced response. The median home days were similar across all study arms. Compared with usual care, the cumulative odds ratios (CORs) were 0.96 (credible interval [CrI], 0.70-1.32) for RPM-low standard response, 0.86 (95% CrI, 0.60-1.23) for RPM-high standard response, 1.01 (95% CrI, 0.76-1.33) for RPM-low enhanced response, and 0.96 (95% CrI, 0.69-1.36) for RPM-high enhanced response, and superiority probability was less than 55% for all comparisons. Among patients 65 years and older, standard and enhanced response arms had fewer home days compared with usual care (COR, 0.56 [95% CrI, 0.36-0.85] and 0.67 [95% CrI, 0.45-0.98], respectively). These findings support reevaluating and tailoring remote monitoring after acute care for sepsis and lower respiratory tract infection to support further alignment with patients’ needs and desire for personalized monitoring.